scott phillips motley fool — the man, briefly disambiguated

scott phillips sounds, on the page, like a character from a novel. motley fool scott phillips sounds like a man with a small office. i confused them. mom corrected me without knowing she did. mike, later, did not. the receipt wallet absorbed the correction. HT7 said the spoon is a smaller bowl, which arrived sideways but felt relevant.

at the desk on a friday. carla is upstairs in a vendor walkthrough on the third floor. i have, give or take, the back end of the morning. nobody is asking what i’m doing.

so. scott phillips motley fool. the name landed in my inbox attached to a newsletter mike pinned to my fridge over thanksgiving. i looked at it. i decided, with the confidence of a man who has not done any research, that scott phillips was a recurring character in a series of novels i had not yet read. the kind of man who walks into a small australian office wearing a jacket and a regret. that turned out to be wrong.

scott phillips is a real analyst. he writes for an outlet called the noble tradition of being publicly wrong with style, which is the working definition i landed on for that whole operation. the operation is real. the man is real. the office, i assume, exists. i corrected the assumption later, after sunday, after a 9-minute snooze that did not solve anything but did push the alarm into a more dignified hour. before sunday, scott phillips was, in my head, a chapter heading.

scott phillips motley fool, who he is, briefly

so. the actual man. scott phillips works as an analyst at motley fool australia, the australian arm of the parent operation. he writes commentary. he picks stocks. he appears on podcasts mike has, on at least one occasion, tried to play in the background at the bar while pretending it was sports. it wasn’t sports. mike has a system for taxes. it does not include podcasts.

i’m telling you the basics because i had to learn them in reverse. i had already filed scott phillips, in my head, under “literary character, australian, late forties, owns a brown leather small office with a corporate suffix and a chair that swivels”. then a friday newsletter clipping made it clear he was a real working analyst, and the literary character had to be evicted from the investigation.

the eviction was, in real time, embarrassing. i kept reaching for the novel scott. the novel scott was better-dressed.

why i thought he was a character at first, in fairness to me

i want to defend the original mistake. scott phillips, said out loud, sounds like the protagonist of a quiet british drama. add motley fool to it and you have, on the page, a phrase that reads like a chapter title. scott phillips and the motley fool. it sounds like a heist movie set in a regional bank. it sounds like the kind of film i would watch on a long flight and forget by landing, the way i mostly remembered trading places as a vibe rather than a plot.

names do this. names land in the brain wearing a costume. you spend three weeks before realizing the man is, in fact, an analyst at a desk somewhere in melbourne, and not the fictional brother of a man you saw in a film you half-watched on a tuesday. the brain does what it does. i am not, on this front, qualified to argue with it.

i’m not the only one. a man at the bar told me, last spring, that he had assumed scott phillips was the warm-up act at a music venue. he had a beard. he seemed sure. i did not correct him, because i was, at the time, still wrong myself.

mom on sunday had never heard of him, fair enough

mom called sunday. she always calls sunday. it is her power and i have stopped resisting it. she asked what i was working on. i said i was, somehow, writing about scott phillips. she said “who” in the way she says it, which is not a question, it is a small audit.

i tried to explain. i said: scott phillips, australian, motley fool. she said it sounded like a character from one of the shows she used to watch with my dad. she meant a british procedural with a man in a coat, probably. she was not far off, considering my own first read. she was, in fact, my own first read with twenty extra years of confidence.

then she asked if i was eating. i said yes. she said the freezer was a friend, which is the kind of sentence she drops on a sunday and walks off from. i hung up. the kitchen had nothing in it. the seventh microwave hummed, briefly, in agreement.

the relevance is this: my mom had never heard of scott phillips. neither has most of the english-speaking population. the man’s reach is real but specific. the literary character version of him, that i invented in the kitchen, has, in our house alone, more cultural weight. that’s a small embarrassing finding and i’m noting it.

mike at the corner had a scott in his life once, unrelated

i went to the corner bar later. mike was on his usual stool. i asked him if he had ever heard of scott phillips, motley fool. mike said he had known a scott once, in a previous decade, who had owed him forty dollars over a pool game and disappeared. mike said all scotts owed him money in his head, retroactively, on principle.

i pointed out that this scott was a different scott. mike said he understood, in the way you understand something at a bar, which is not actually understanding it but agreeing to keep the conversation moving. mike then asked if the motley fool one had recommended any stocks worth a beer. i said i didn’t know. mike said that was, in his expert opinion, the kind of move only a man who answers to the worst label in english would describe as a recommendation. i did not, in the moment, take that as an idiot-shaped insult. i took it as a working definition.

i wrote that on a coaster. mike read it. mike said the coaster was wrong, because in his experience names were almost always characters, and the trouble started when people forgot. mike then accidentally lit the coaster with a match while reaching for an ashtray. the coaster, briefly, was correct, and then it was not.

the receipt i kept from a scott-related transaction, which is a stretch

i keep things in a wallet that i should be retiring. the wallet is mostly receipts. the receipts are mostly from places i don’t remember entering. one of the receipts, i discovered yesterday, is from a coffee i bought after first reading a scott phillips piece. the coffee was four dollars. the receipt is, by the count i keep running, three months old, faded on one corner, and folded around the paper-thin remains of a parking stub.

this is a stretch, as a connection. i’m aware. but the receipt wallet is, in my filing system, the most honest archive i own. it remembers what i was doing the day i got the name wrong. it has the timestamp. it has the four-dollar evidence. (i own one tie. i own one wallet. the difference between them is that the tie has been to seventeen weddings and the wallet has been to forty corner stores. the wallet is, in raw mileage, winning.)

HT7 says “the spoon is a smaller bowl. redundant.” i mention HT7 because the receipt, in the wallet, is a smaller wallet. and the wallet is, eventually, a smaller drawer. it is bowls all the way down. i’d let scott phillips audit this if he were ever willing to look at my finances, which, given his stated profession, he would refuse politely.

verdict — scott is real, the disambiguation took longer than expected

so. the verdict, after a friday morning with the rest of the morning to spare. scott phillips is a real australian analyst. he works for motley fool australia. he has, presumably, a desk and a chair and a coffee. he does not, as far as i can tell, have a tweed jacket or a motive or a brother in a regional bank. all of that was supplied by me.

the disambiguation took, by my running tally, four conversations, one sunday call, one bar visit, two coasters, and an unrelated receipt from a coffee i barely remember. that is, in this kitchen and at this desk, what an investigation looks like. the result is correct. the methodology was, in places, supplied by mike.

i’d recommend scott phillips, motley fool, to anyone who needs a real analyst with a real opinion. i’d recommend scott phillips, the literary character, to anyone who needs a man in a tweed jacket to stand at a window and look at rain. i don’t know which version of him i needed first. i suspect, in the way mom suspects most things, both.

↑