pathological lying — i looked into it (4 parts)

the elevator door slid back and the landlord was already standing inside, hands in his coat, the certified letter folded in half in his left fist like a small sentence i owed him. pathological lying, the phrase i had come to the desk to write about, suddenly had a face wearing reading glasses and a polite cough. i smiled the way a tenant smiles when his rent has posted late and the floor numbers have not yet started moving.

writing this from the desk, thursday, 11:23am, a vendor walkthrough rumbling on the fourth floor. carla just messaged team chat — she is in a procurement sit-down with a man whose signature reads “strategic accounts.” she will come back with a free pen and a grudge.

so. pathological lying, after an elevator that did not, in the end, kill me. the landlord is not a pathological liar. that distinction is mine, on a small scale, on the days i let it be.

pathological lying is the habit of saying things that aren’t true to people who weren’t asking, often without gain, sometimes elaborate, sometimes reflexive, repeated across years. it differs from a single lie by being a pattern, and from strategic lying by lacking a reason. one elevator dodge is an event. forty dated receipts are the rung.

PATTERN. NOT. INCIDENT. THAT. IS. THE. ENTIRE. RUNG.

that one i would tape to the inside of the seventh microwave, if the seventh microwave were still operational, which it is not. people use the phrase for any thursday they did not enjoy. that is not what it is for. the phrase is for a pattern, sustained, often without profit, occasionally believed by the inventor. the cluster’s main file on what a liar actually is does the structural work one floor up.

pathological lying, the working version i can defend

the version i can defend before lunch has four parts.

one: it is not strategic. nobody is getting promoted, nobody is being protected. two: it is reflexive — out of the mouth before truth has finished tying its shoes. three: the audience does not benefit. four: the lie is part of a pattern, dated, repeated, sometimes elaborated. one is a thursday. forty is a practice.

that fourth one does the real work. one lie is, on most days, a tired person choosing a four-second silence over the truth. the elevator was that. i said “all good” to a man holding the certified letter that proved it was not. but if i say “all good” every month for two years, with the same letter folded the same way in his fist — that is a different shape. that is the rung.

the elevator where the landlord caught me

fifth floor going down. i was on my way to the lobby to dodge a phone call — the screen had been buzzing since 10:47, the number unfamiliar in the way that suggests a man, an institution, or both. i had stepped onto a small platform that travels away from a problem. the platform had the landlord on it.

he is fine, as a person. mid-fifties, the kind of calm that has its own zip code. good morning. good morning. i pressed L. the L was already pressed. that small humiliation is not relevant, but i logged it.

then he produced, from his coat, the certified letter. the return-address sticker said the management company. on its back, my unit number, in his own handwriting. he had been carrying it around the building, waiting for me to be in a room with him.

“you’ve been hard to catch,” he said, the way one says it to a cat. i said, “yeah, busy week.” it had not been. it had been a week in which i had avoided three people, two emails, and the call now going to voicemail in my pocket. on the rung-chart, this was strategic, not pathological. but you can see how a hundred of these — small, friendly, factually wrong — start to look like a pattern from the outside, even when each one feels, from the inside, like logistics.

the receipt in my wallet that proved nothing

when the landlord handed me the letter, i, for reasons the desk has not finished examining, opened my wallet. some interior reflex about producing evidence. inside, between an expired loyalty card and a fold of receipts i have been treating as art, was a slip from a hardware store, dated three months ago, for a part i had bought to fix the kitchen sink i had since told him was “doing better.”

the receipt was not evidence of anything. the part had not been installed. it was in a drawer behind a roll of tape and a dead battery. but i held it up briefly, as if it were a passport, and said, “i’ve been on top of it.” the landlord nodded the way a landlord nods. the elevator hit L. the doors opened.

that receipt is the unit of measurement for the difference between regular lying and the heavier rung. a regular liar files it and forgets it. a strategic liar uses it deliberately, knowing what it does and does not prove. a person on the way to pathological lying, on the long horizon, produces the receipt and, after a year, comes to half-believe the part was installed. the receipt has rewritten the kitchen. the noun rewrites the room.

the phone i did not pick up, again

the phone, in the lobby, finally stopped. one missed call. no voicemail. the voicemail, by the way, is full. it has been full since august. that is itself a small, durable lie i have been telling, in passive form, to anybody who has tried to leave one. they hear “this user’s mailbox is full.” i am sending “i am unreachable.” those are not the same. the difference is a lie.

that one does not, on its own, qualify. it is a lie of infrastructure — the kind a man tells by not maintaining a system. but if you took my voicemail, my unopened mail pile, my dodged elevator hellos, my receipt-as-passport, and the email i did not answer last friday, and put them on a single shelf, you would have a small, neatly-arranged record. the kind a person might, after a few years, begin to confuse with their actual life.

that is the thing about the pattern. it does not announce itself. it accumulates. the rung does not require ambition. it requires patience.

when ‘pathological’ is fair and when it is melodrama

i want to be fair about the word, because it gets used badly. it is fair when the pattern is sustained, often elaborate, frequently without external benefit. it is melodrama when thrown at any person whose week you did not enjoy. used loosely, the word becomes furniture, and the furniture stops doing anything. there is a film about a world where nobody can lie until one man learns how — the 2009 ricky gervais picture the invention of lying, a comedy on the surface and a small pamphlet about the word underneath.

i keep coming back to a take of mine that overlaps: reading on a kindle is the same as reading. a thing is what it does. a screen that delivers a novel is a book. a small fabrication that arrives reflexively, without gain, four times a month for three years, is the heavier rung. format does not change function. duration does. pattern does.

verdict, i am consistent, label me kindly

so the verdict on pathological lying: a pattern, not an event. sustained, not occasional. frequently unprofitable, which is the part that makes it strange. a strategic liar is at least running a business. the heavier rung is running a household of inventions, paying its rent in attention, indefinitely, with no clear customer.

and if any of this felt close to your own thursday, the cluster’s softer entry — the same word in urdu, with a landlord in it — is, in its way, a kinder room to sit in. the rent is in another currency, and that helps, briefly.

carla just slacked: “got a free pen, lost an hour, send help.” the procurement man’s signature, she reports, was “a four-line haiku about synergy.” i told her i’d buy the first round. that, on the rung-chart, is an honest sentence. it might be the only one i have produced today.

↑