how to tell if your smart — 1 fairly sure investigation

telling if you’re smart, supposedly, can be done with a mirror, a notebook, and a quiet hour. i’m fairly sure i have all three. i have not put them in the same room. the mirror, currently, is in the bathroom.

thursday, 9:14am, the laptop tilted exactly enough that anyone walking past sees a vendor onboarding deck and not the search bar with the missing apostrophe. carla is upstairs in a vendor training session on the third floor, gone until lunch, which leaves an honest stretch of the morning for an audit nobody asked for.

the typo, before anything else. how to tell if your smart is what the search bar agrees on, with the wrong your sitting where you’re belongs. the corrected version returned fewer suggestions. the people typing the smart-question are typing it with the apostrophe absent, and the algorithm, far from grading us, has decided to meet us where we live.

the long-form spine of this cluster runs through my pillar on confirmation bias as the warm bath of always being correct, the SMART anchor i keep coming back to whenever a question this earnest shows up in the search bar. start there for the framework. stay here for the five-item checklist that runs at the desk on a thursday morning technically owed to onboarding.

writing this from a desk that is not, technically, where i should be writing from. the onboarding deck is folded behind the search tab. the cursor is in the wrong document for the third time today and it is not yet ten.

1. how to tell if your smart, the typo holds

the typo, before the items. how to tell if your smart outranks the corrected version by a margin i checked twice from two different windows. the search engine did not nudge me toward you’re. it served the missing apostrophe as if it were the question itself.

so the typo is item zero. you ask a hard question with a small grammatical mistake, and the answer comes back fitted to the audience that types the way you type. that audience is the inverse audience. methodology: a folder on a hard drive, a tweet from a man i have never met, a paragraph from a polite chatbot, an appliance with an established body count, and a stack of 47 tabs open right now, four of which i opened on a tuesday in march.

2. item one, the wall of insults audit, allegedly

my wall of insults lives, technically, in a folder on this same laptop, with screenshots of every cruel thing a stranger online ever sent me. the wall is digital. it has always been digital. forget anything earlier posts implied about printing them out and tacking them up — that was the storytelling. the folder is the literal location.

item one is the audit. you open the folder and read the screenshots in the order they arrived. the smart-test is not whether the insults are accurate. the smart-test is which ones you kept. i kept the ones i could dismiss. i deleted the ones that landed. the wall is a curated exhibit titled “strangers who were obviously unwell when they typed this”. the three or four insults a year that were, frankly, accurate live in a different folder. the different folder is empty.

that empty folder is the most honest piece of evidence in the audit. a smart person would have kept the cuts.

3. item two, productivity bro’s daily test

productivity bro, who exists exclusively online and has never appeared in a room i was also in, posts a daily test. one tweet, somewhere, will read “if you can’t answer these three questions in under sixty seconds, you are not operating at capacity”, and the three questions will be the three questions productivity bro answered, in his head, before posting them.

item two is the deliberate fail. you read the tweet at 12:14pm and you let yourself fail the test on purpose. you do not answer the three questions. you note the feeling of being graded by a stranger with a ring light and you decline to take the grade.

i’m fairly sure there’s a piece in a serious magazine i don’t subscribe to that points out the smart-question is mostly diagnostic of who’s doing the asking. productivity bro, on the thursday in question, was diagnostic of productivity bro.

4. item three, the chatgpt screening says no

chatgpt, as a screen, is the polite paragraph generator that filters the contact form on the website i pretend i don’t run. on the thursday in question, at 12:38pm, i fed the smart-question into the same generator and asked it, in plain language, am i smart. the generator returned four paragraphs, in serif font, with the warmth of a hospital corridor. the verdict was, technically, yes, but with caveats, and the caveats were the entire paragraph.

item three is the screening, and the rejection of the screening. the smart-test is not whether the polite paragraph generator says yes. the smart-test is whether you accept the verdict. i did not. the generator has been trained on the same audience that types the smart-question with the apostrophe missing. you cannot grade the boat from inside the boat.

5. item four, the seventh microwave is the test

the seventh microwave, on the kitchen counter back at the apartment, two feet to the left of the kettle, is the most reliable instrument in the audit. by 3:47pm on a thursday it will be between cycles, with three seconds left on the display from a reheat nobody opened. the microwave does not vote. the microwave does not screen. the microwave abstains.

item four is the abstention. you stand, in your head, in front of the appliance most directly responsible for your last six failures, and you ask in plain words, am i smart. the appliance does not blink. it runs the cycle it was asked to run, with no opinion about the operator. that is the most honest test in the room.

HT24 belongs here, cited and not defended. “ironing is a class war i refuse to fight” is the line i keep on a sticky note above the counter, and the operator who destroyed six predecessors is a person whose refusal to iron, refusal to file, and refusal to handle basic kitchen physics runs on the same evidence base. brief cameo from a sibling investigation about an idiot abroad and what travel does to the smart-test — because the same audit, run in a different time zone, returns the same abstention with worse coffee. the word idiot shows up there too, naturally, in the slug and in the body.

6. item five, the apostrophe is the answer

item five circles back to the typo. the apostrophe, missing in the search bar, is the answer the audit was always going to return. you typed the question wrong. you got the answer you typed for. the search engine, the chatbot, the productivity bro tweet, the wall of insults audit, the abstaining microwave — all of them are responding to the version of you that pressed return without checking your against you’re.

a smart person would have caught the apostrophe. there was only the asker, on a thursday, with onboarding owed elsewhere, running an audit in a window kept small. item five is the apostrophe. in absence, it is louder than any of the four items above it.

worth a small cousin sentence before the verdict, because the smart-question always rhymes with its opposite. the running pillar on the word idiot is the longer companion piece. the idiot is the man who knows he is the idiot; the smart person is the man telling everyone else that he is. the difference is on the receipt, not the forehead. on a good day, the smart-test is just an idiot-test with the names rearranged.

7. verdict, the telling is the trap, again

so here is where the items land. the wall of insults audit returned an empty folder of accurate hits. productivity bro’s test returned a deliberate fail. the chatgpt screening returned a polite yes i declined to accept. the seventh microwave abstained. the apostrophe was missing the whole time. the audit returned the only verdict the day was prepared to release: the telling is the trap.

none of this is definitive. the smart-question, asked at scale with the wrong apostrophe, returns eleven million soft answers, and the people most certain of the hard answer are the ones who did not run the audit at all. the brief reference to a sitcom about a paper company in scranton earlier is the only piece of pop culture i can confirm was, on this particular thursday, both watched and remembered.

3:47pm by the screen clock, off by two months for reasons i refuse to investigate. carla still upstairs in the training. deck still folded over the search bar. four of the 47 tabs still confirming a thing i decided in the elevator.

↑