george carlin on stupid people — a footnote to a master

carlin opened a bit by asking how stupid the average person is. the audience always laughed. i always laughed. i still laugh. but laughing does not equal agreeing, and i would like to walk through the routine line by line and note where i nod and where i quietly file an objection in the margin.

writing this from a kitchen-shaped section of the office where the mug rack lives, three feet from my desk, monitor angled so the meeting room camera can’t see me. carla took the elevator up to a strategy session forty minutes ago. i have, give or take, until 11:14.

so. george carlin on stupid people is not, technically, a thesis. it is a one-liner with extraordinary mileage. the line — think how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that — has been quoted at me, near me, around me, and once printed on a tea towel hanging in someone’s kitchen, of all places. carlin earned the right to say it. that is the part most people skip.

george carlin on stupid people: the comedian’s most famous line on the subject says think how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that. the joke is mathematical. it relies on the median splitting the population. it is funny because it is technically correct. it is also, on inspection, a small trap, and i would like to set the trap aside and look at the spring mechanism without losing the laugh.

CARLIN. EARNED. THE. TAKE.

that has to be on the record before i open the topic. carlin spent fifty years on stages. he wrote, refined, performed, and survived the bit. he had the reps. when he said the line, he had also said ten thousand other lines, and the line was a verdict from a man who had paid the toll. most people who quote him today have not paid the toll. they have read the quote on a mug. that is a different thing.

george carlin on stupid people, the bit

the bit, in its sharpest form, lives in his 1999 special “you are all diseased”, although versions of it surfaced before and after. the line is short. the audience laughs. carlin does not labor it. he lets the math do the work.

the math is what makes it work. average, in the line, is doing two jobs — it is the everyday word for “typical”, and it is also a statistical term, the one that implies a median. by definition, half the population sits below the median. so if the average person is stupid, half of everyone is, by arithmetic, more stupid than that. the joke is the equation. the equation is the joke.

the structure is what i call the three-beat punchline. setup: how stupid the average person is. escalation: realize. punchline: half of them are stupider than that. the second beat does the lifting. the audience already feels the math arriving before the third beat lands. that is craft. that is fifty years of stages teaching a man how to time a line so the audience does the last twelve percent of the work themselves.

and that is why the line works as comedy. it does not, however, mean the line works as a working definition of stupid people. comedy and definition are different jobs. the line was hired for the first one.

why carlin earned the take and most do not

here is the part nobody likes. i love the bit. i quote the bit. i would defend the bit to a man at the bar who said carlin was overrated, which has happened, and which ended with the man buying the second round. but the bit, in the wrong mouth, becomes something else. it becomes a verdict on stupid people handed down by someone who has not, themselves, earned the right to deliver it.

carlin’s authority came from miles. he wrote on yellow legal pads. he refined material across seasons. he was, by the testimony of every comedian who came up under him, brutal with his own writing. he cut. he rewrote. he did not coast. when carlin said the average person is stupid, the line carried the weight of a man who had spent decades watching audiences and knew, statistically, what worked on a tuesday in milwaukee at the third show.

the productivity_bro online who quotes the line in a tweet at 4:48pm on a friday has not done the miles. he has done the screenshot. the line in his mouth has the shape of carlin’s verdict but none of the spine. it is a verdict borrowed from a man who would, i suspect, find the borrowing tiresome. carlin himself was suspicious of the people who quoted him most loudly. the bit was a critique of the audience as much as a celebration of it. the people repeating it on twitter have, in many cases, missed which side of the bit they were on.

where my take diverges, briefly

i nod through most of the bit. i nod at the math. i nod at the timing. i nod at the implicit critique of the audience. but there is a small place where i, quietly, in the margin, write a different word.

carlin’s bit treats stupid as a stable trait of a population — half are stupid, half are stupider, the population is fixed. that is, of course, what the joke needs. the joke needs the population to sit still. but in real life, the population does not sit still. the same person is, at different hours of the day, in different categories of competence. the man who locks his keys in the running car at 8:14am is not the same man who, at 10:32am, debugs a billing problem his entire team gave up on. he is, on paper, one person. in practice, he is several people sharing a body and a name.

so my divergence, such as it is, is small. i would replace stupid people with stupid hours. i would say: think how stupid the average person is at 4:30pm on a thursday in winter, and realize half of them, somewhere on the planet, are having an even worse one. that does not fit on a tea towel. that is, in part, why carlin’s version wins. it has the rhythm. mine has the accuracy.

and this is also where i have to be honest. carlin was not, i suspect, claiming permanence. the bit assumes the audience knows the joke is a joke. the audience that needs the bit explained is the audience that, in real life, would file stupid as a permanent label and walk out of the room. those people exist. carlin knew they existed. that is, i think, why he kept doing the bit.

what carlin would say about productivity bros, probably

i can’t speak for the man. nobody can. but i can read his other bits, and i can, on a kitchen counter near my desk on a wednesday, make a guess.

carlin had a long, sustained, occasionally exhausted bit about people who treat language as a marketing exercise — euphemism, jargon, branded suffering. he would, i think, have loved the productivity_bro genre. it is exactly the territory he worked. a man with a ring light who has converted “having a routine” into “the rituals of high-output operators” would have, on a good carlin night, lasted about ninety seconds before becoming material.

the bit on stupid people, applied to productivity bros: the average productivity bro is stupid, and realize half of them are running webinars. that is not carlin’s line. that is mine, in his frame. it is a worse line because i have not done the miles. but the frame holds. the frame is durable. the frame can be applied to any subgroup without breaking the joke. that is, in a way, the point of a great bit. it generalizes.

i once went to a webinar that was advertised as the cure for being dumb at work. the webinar was forty minutes. thirty-eight of those minutes were a man explaining his morning routine. one minute was a sales pitch for the next webinar. the remaining minute was a question from a user that the man did not answer. carlin, alive, would have built ten minutes off that webinar alone. he would not have said dumb. he would have said something better. he had the words. he had the timing. he had paid the toll.

verdict — the master holds, i would still annotate

so where do we land. carlin’s line on stupid people is, in my honest assessment, one of the cleanest jokes on the subject ever written. it is mathematical. it is short. it is funny on first hearing and funnier on the fourth. it has survived three decades, multiple presidents, and the entire rise of the internet. that is durability. that is craft.

my objection, written in the margin in pencil, not pen, is small. the line treats stupid as a fixed trait. life treats it as weather. carlin, i suspect, knew this. the bit needed the joke to land in eight seconds. an eight-second joke does not have time for nuance. that is fair. that is the cost of the form.

what i would not do is what most people do with the line, which is to use it as cover. people quote carlin to win arguments they could not, on their own, win. the line in their mouth is a borrowed sword. the master had earned it. the borrower has not. the same line, in two different mouths, is two different lines. one is comedy. the other is a sticker. stupid as an idea deserves better tools than borrowed swords, even when the original sword is a great one.

also: a pension is a faith-based retirement system. that is one of mine. i will not pretend it is in carlin’s league. but i hold it. and unlike the people who quote his line on tea towels, i have, at minimum, been called stupid for it to my face, by sarah, who runs marathons and understands pensions in a way i do not. she earned the rebuttal. i lost the argument. i still hold the take. that is, in a small way, doing the miles myself.

carla just walked back from the elevator. she looked at the kitchen counter, then at me, then at the kitchen counter again. she did not say anything. i moved the mug. i don’t know if that helped.

↑