pathological liar treatment — 4 things i drafted at the desk

the airpod, the singular, sits on the wood like a small ear that has heard everything. pathological liar treatment, the search said, involves talking. i am not built for that. tom once did the talking for both of us. the taxman, in serif font, also disagrees politely. i ignore them both at the same volume.

drafted at the desk, thursday at 11:23, between a vendor onboarding nobody invited me to and a slack from finance with the subject line “quick question” which is, in this building, never quick and rarely a question. the seventh microwave is humming in the breakroom one floor down. it is not mine. i can hear it anyway.

so. pathological liar treatment. i typed it at 11:08 because the autocomplete offered it after i typed three words and stopped. the cluster’s working pillar on the word liar, with the rungs i keep coming back to already lays out the heaviest end of the noun. this post is what happens when you take that noun, attach the word treatment to it, and discover the result is a thursday morning at a desk that, by 4pm, will have produced one fewer answer than it started with.

pathological liar treatment describes structured clinical work — therapy, accountability scaffolding, sometimes medication for an underlying condition — used to interrupt a pattern of fluent, unprompted, often self-defeating untruths. in practice the treatment requires a person who books appointments, returns calls, and opens certified mail. that requirement is, for some of us, the whole problem stated quietly.

TREATMENT. ASSUMES. A. PATIENT. WHO. ANSWERS. THE. PHONE.

that goes on the inside of a microwave door, if microwave doors still functioned as bulletin boards in this household. the seventh microwave does not close fully since february. the magnet keeps slipping off. the index card with the line on it is, as a result, on the wood, next to the airpod, where everything important ends up by accident.

pathological liar treatment, the desk version

here is the version i can defend, drafted between 11:08 and 11:34 with a coffee and a screen that keeps dimming because the IT policy decided five minutes was generous. pathological liar treatment, in the form i would tape to the inside of the airpod case if airpod cases had walls, is four moving parts. one, a clinician who can sit through the long pause where the answer was supposed to live. two, a calendar that does not, by friday, eat itself. three, a patient who can describe the lie without immediately telling another one to soften the first. four, the willingness to lose the small reward the lie was, secretly, providing.

that fourth part is, by my reading, where the literature gets quiet. the small reward — the warm static of having gotten away with it — is the engine. the rest is upholstery. i have, on the desk in front of me, a wood surface with one airpod on it. the other airpod has been gone since the train in november. the warm static of saying “they’re in my bag” when the gym desk asked is, by an embarrassing margin, the most honest part of my morning.

tom would book the appointment, i would not

tom called on monday. tom calls on mondays the way other people brush their teeth. i did not pick up. the voicemail icon is now wearing the small red badge it has been wearing since february, a number that, the last time i looked, rounded up to a figure that would embarrass me to type.

tom, if you handed him this search bar, would google pathological liar treatment the way he googles a restaurant — to compare three options, read the third-party reviews, and book the one nearest his house. by 9pm there would be an appointment, a calendar invite, and a follow-up text to his wife with the words “i’ll let you know how it goes.” he would also, having booked it, not need it. that is the cruel arithmetic of treatment. the people who book it, in many cases, are the people who already had the half-resolved version of the thing.

i, by contrast, opened the page, scrolled past two clinics, and went back to the autocomplete. the cluster’s earlier working note on the compulsive-liar definition, drafted with similar reluctance covered the smaller end of the noun. this post is the heavier end, attempted by a person who has not, in any active sense, returned tom’s call. that is not a coincidence. that is the post.

the airpod that survives, which is the metaphor

the surviving airpod is on the wood. binaural sound is, at this point, a luxury i have stopped budgeting for. one ear gets the podcast. the other ear gets the breakroom microwave one floor down. the asymmetry is, on most days, accurate to my listening posture in general — half-attended, half-distracted, half-honest, half not.

i bring it up because the airpod is, unintentionally, the picture i would show a clinician if i had one. “this,” i would say, sliding it across the table, “is the level of presence i can sustain on a good day.” the clinician would write something down. the airpod would say nothing, because the airpod is, in this scene, also me. for the broader case on what happens when half-attention becomes a portable way of life, see the cross-cluster file on what an idiot abroad gets right about half-paying-attention as a method — a man squinting at a pyramid abroad, baffled by a country he did not choose, is closer to my desk life than any productivity book has been. the idiot in that frame is on a plane. this idiot is at a desk. the half-presence is the same.

the missing airpod, by extension, is the version of me that books the appointment. that one i lost on a train in november. it was never recovered. the train kept going.

why “pathological” makes the treatment sound clinical

the word does heavy lifting. pathological implies a condition, a chart, a billing code, a person across a desk with credentials. the cluster has a long working note on the pathological lying definition i drafted at this same desk on a different day, and that note did the work the dictionary tried to do and failed. the word, in clinical use, comes packaged with a set of expectations: there is a patient, there is a treatment, there is a measurable outcome.

the trouble is the noun is also, in the wild, a verdict. somebody calls somebody else a pathological liar at a dinner party and the conversation ends. nobody, in that exchange, is thinking about CBT. they are thinking about whether to refill the wine. the verdict version of the word and the clinical version of the word share a syllable count and almost nothing else. treatment, the second word, only attaches cleanly to the second version. on the first version, treatment lands like a misprint.

there is a 2009 ricky gervais film, the invention of lying, where a man in a world of compulsory truth invents the first untruth and rides it into a small fortune, that frames the problem in reverse. the world of total truth is unbearable. the small lie is the lubricant. the heavy version of the noun is what happens when the lubricant becomes the engine. clinicians treat the second. the rest of us live with the first.

when treatment means “please answer the phone”

the practical, low-stakes treatment, for a person at the rung i seem to be on, is not therapy. therapy is the strategic version, available to people whose calendars survive contact with reality. the practical version, for me, on a thursday at 11:23, is a single instruction taped to the inside of the airpod case if the airpod case had walls: answer the phone.tom’s call goes to voicemail. mom’s call goes to voicemail. the man who calls — i refuse to say who he is — also goes to voicemail. the voicemail box is, by some bureaucratic decision i do not understand, still receiving messages despite being, by every metric, full.

the treatment, in that frame, is not CBT. the treatment is the verb. answering. picking up. saying, when asked what time the move-in is, the actual time. saying, when asked whether the gym bag has the gym bag, no. saying, when tom asks whether i am okay, whatever the truth is, even if the truth is “i don’t know yet, can i call you sunday.” sunday is a placeholder. sunday is not always sunday.

verdict, treatment exists for people who open mail

so here, by the cooling coffee and the index card with the holler line on it, is what i can defend. pathological liar treatment is a real and specific clinical intervention with documented success rates for people who can answer the door, return the call, and sit through the long pause without filling it with a small invented sentence. whether i personally qualify is a question the voicemail box and tom’s monday calls have been, in their own quiet way, asking me since february.

the airpod is on the wood. the seventh microwave is, one floor down, still humming. tom is, by my best estimate, between meetings, with his phone face-down on a desk that, unlike mine, is technically his. the landlord is, by the buzzer pattern of the last six weeks, due to ring on a thursday at exactly the moment i am most distracted. i am, in this respect, prepared. i have already drafted the answer. the answer is, predictably, thursday. thursday is always thursday.

slack notification, finance: “circling back on the receipts.” i have not, in any active sense, looked at the receipts. the wallet is in the drawer next to the certified letters i have not opened. that is a separate post and i will not be writing it today. the airpod has not moved. neither, frankly, have i.

↑