feature illustration for the signs you are working with a narcissist featured essay on idiotagain.com

11 signs you are working with a narcissist explained




eleven signs at work is the kind of list i have personally test-driven over four jobs and roughly forty-seven open browser tabs. i scored well. i did not want to score well. nobody wants to score well on this one. the carousel telling you to score well is, almost certainly, charging you for the privilege.

tuesday, 2:14pm at the desk. the floor is in its post-lunch lull, half the seats are warm and unattended. carla is at the kitchenette with a fresh mug. one airpod in; the other has been off the team since february.

the project at this desk, before the budget pivot people drift back from their salads, is to write the post about the working 11 signs you are working with a narcissist as a side-by-side. side-by-side is the only format that keeps the words from sounding like a hr complaint and starts making them sound like an honest description of a colleague who is, on the second floor right now, charming a procurement vendor with the same face he used at noon to deny he ever said the deadline was friday. lists alone read like grievances. tables read like inventory.

11 signs you are working with a narcissist: a stable set of office behaviors — quiet credit theft, calm contradiction in writing, calendar control, scheduled forgetting of agreed scope, charm flipped by audience, ledgered favors, weaponized politeness, cc-as-threat, blame routed to juniors, undisturbed sleep on the night your project burned, and a steady drift of authorship toward them. eleven rows. the table is the post.

A. SIGN. AT. WORK. IS. STILL. A. SIGN.

i need that on the wall before the columns get drawn. the laziest version of this conversation downgrades every sign at the office into “that is just corporate”. corporate is a missed elevator. corporate is not a multi-quarter operating system that runs on your last performance review and a slack thread you can no longer find.

11 signs you are working with a narcissist, the working list i actually carry

the working version of the 11 signs you are working with a narcissist i actually carry is, plainly, eleven items. it began life as fifteen, then nine, then thirteen, depending on which job i was leaving on which year. the larger room this list sits inside is the one i wrote about a partner’s calm rewriting of small household memories until you stop trusting your own week. that piece is the engine. this post is the office-shaped version, retuned for fluorescent lighting.

  1. quiet credit theft. a deck you wrote on a sunday is presented monday with their name on slide one and yours, generously, in the appendix.
  2. calm contradiction in writing. a thread says “let’s go with option b” on tuesday. by friday, in a new thread, it always said option a.
  3. calendar control. their availability is a fortress. yours is a public lawn. meetings move toward their windows; explanations move toward your evenings.
  4. scheduled forgetting of agreed scope. friday’s “we agreed on three deliverables” becomes monday’s “i don’t recall scoping that, can you point me to where?”
  5. charm flipped by audience. warm to the vp, plain to you, in the same hallway, three minutes apart.
  6. ledgered favors. a coverage you provided in march is held over your head in september, fully itemized, with interest.
  7. weaponized politeness. “thanks so much for flagging” delivered in the cadence of a person locking a door. the door is yours.
  8. cc-as-threat. their boss appears on a routine email about a non-routine question. now there is an audience.
  9. blame routed to juniors. when the project burns, the intern is somehow responsible for the fire department’s response time.
  10. undisturbed sleep on the night your project burned. they look rested. they were rested. you can see it on the 9am stand-up.
  11. steady drift of authorship. by year-end, every win in your team’s review deck is, by sentence structure alone, theirs.

that is the eleven. carla just walked back from the kitchenette and i covered the screen, on instinct, with a window labelled budget pivot v3. she did not look. carla rarely looks.

the comparative table — work signs vs the personal version, briefly

the engine is the same. the office adds a calendar, a salary band, and a slack search bar that, suspiciously, does not return the message you swear you read on march fourteenth. the table compares the two columns where they actually diverge — not where they are merely the same in different shoes.

sign at the officehow it sounds at home, same engine
quiet credit theft“i was the one who really pushed for that vacation, you remember.”
calm contradiction in writing“i never said dinner at seven, look at the message, you read it wrong.”
calendar controltheir friends, their schedule. yours, optional.
scheduled forgetting of scope“we never agreed you’d have a key, that was your interpretation.”
charm by audiencewarm to the doorman, plain to you, ninety seconds apart.
ledgered favors“after everything i did the year your dad was in the hospital.”
weaponized politeness“i appreciate you sharing that.” said in the tone you use to cancel a subscription.
cc-as-threat“i told my mother you said that, by the way.”
blame routed to juniorsthe dishwasher broke when your friends visited; therefore, your friends.
undisturbed sleepa 7am voicemail asking calmly why you “got so emotional” at midnight.
drift of authorshipthe apartment had problems before they arrived; everything good is, by implication, theirs.

one row leaning right-column, in either life, on a hard week, is not the inventory — that is a hard week. eight rows leaning right for three quarters running, with the same colleague at the other end of the same inbox, and what you have is a workplace pattern with a postal code. for the longer relational version, see the working catalog of characteristics that show up across narcissistic abuse. only the kitchen changes.

the dave-and-mom phone-relay that fed this list

the eleven did not arrive in one sitting. they arrived through a phone-relay i did not realize i was running until last sunday. dave called saturday afternoon to ask, with no preamble, whether his manager — a man dave has named only by job title and a number, “ops 4” — had, in fact, taken credit for a routing fix dave had typed at 11pm on a thursday. dave was not asking for an opinion. dave was asking for a number. how many is too many, was the question.

i said four. dave said it had been six since january. dave laughed in the dry register he uses when something is both true and unfixable. dave still owes me three hundred dollars from a wedding in 2022. ledgered favors is item six because dave taught me to count.

then mom called sunday morning, on the schedule mom has held without negotiation since 2014. mom does not know dave’s manager, has never met him, will never meet him, and yet mom, by the third minute, had named items three and seven from a hundred and fifty miles away. mothers know. it is their power. it cannot be defeated. mom said: “the polite ones are the worst, because nobody believes you.” i wrote it on a parking validation. it became item seven.

the airpod that lets me hear the signs first, allegedly

there is a small case to be made — and i will, briefly, make it — that the reason i hear the eleven faster than my colleagues is that i have been operating on one airpod since february. binaural is a luxury i no longer afford. one ear is in the meeting; the other is in the room. the room is where the signs live. it is, i admit, a thin theory. it is also the only theory i have.

the airpod theory does not, however, hold up against the productivity bro who has been clogging my feed all month with a carousel titled 11 signs at work (save this thread). eleven, fairly, is the right number — credit where due. but his eleven includes “uses corporate jargon” and “does not respond on the weekend”, which are signs of a person who has read the employee handbook. his carousel has fifty-two thousand likes. it is sponsored by his cohort program — fourteen days, six hundred and ninety-seven dollars, leatherette workbook included. he is selling the diagnosis. i am, on a tuesday at 2:14pm, posting it.

i asked chatgpt, against my own better instincts, for its version of the list this morning. i pasted four sentences of context and got back fourteen items, because the model, like a well-meaning intern, never undershoots. five matched my notebook. four were repurposed advice for managing remote contractors. five were filler delivered with the easy confidence of a system that has never, structurally, been there. i closed the tab.

and on the subject of stools, briefly — a hot take, cited, not defended: “all chairs are bar stools eventually.” give any office chair four years and a hard month and it converts. people audit each other on stools the way they cannot audit each other in conference rooms.

verdict — the signs at work are quieter, the harm is the same

so where the working 11 signs you are working with a narcissist lands, with the budget pivot meeting due upstairs in twenty-three minutes:

eleven is the right number. the carousel was right about that, wrong about which eleven. the office version of the engine is quieter than the relational version because the office gives the engine a calendar, a salary, and a search bar. but quieter is not smaller. it is just spread across more quarters. the table is the post. the application is what happens for the rest of your time at this employer, and possibly the next.

the cleanest publicly available picture of a person running these eleven on a coworker, in a film a person can watch on a tuesday in legal good conscience, is the 1999 office satire about a quietly resentful employee on the cusp of his own quiet rebellion. seven of my eleven items match, easy. some films are old and still embarrassingly correct.

i am not selling the fourteen-day cohort. that is somewhere else, with the leatherette workbook. i am posting the eleven for free. the expensive part is the years it takes to draw the table.

the budget pivot people are filing back from lunch. carla has switched mugs, a cleaner ceramic one with a chip on the handle. i am going to close this tab in eleven minutes, on principle. the seventh microwave is, at home, still humming through whatever it was given at noon.

and there it ends — eleven items pencilled into a column, the bro carousel screen-shotted into a folder labelled research, dave’s relay logged, mom’s sentence credited, and a parking validation elevated, again, into editorial substrate. the airpod kept up. the other one is, as ever, somewhere quieter.

yours stupidly,
idiot again
eleven rows on the back of a parking validation, one airpod in, the budget pivot at the door

P.S. dave still owes me three hundred dollars. mom still does not. the bar stool theory holds, on average, by round three.


are you an idiot?

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

more open investigations